Imprimir

Programa

PROGRAMA DE CURSO

CURSO              : Sociologia de la Politica Educativa / Education policy sociology
SIGLA              : SOL3072
CRÉDITOS           : 5 UC/3 SCT
MÓDULOS            : 02
REQUISITOS         : Autorizacion Unidad Academica
CARÁCTER           : Optativo



I.    DESCRIPCION

Las politicas educativas son un area sectorial de gran dinamismo en las ultimas decadas. La fuerte relacion
entre desarrollo economico y democratico, movilidad social y educacion las han transformado en un
campo de disputa politica, confrontacion discursiva, y reconfiguracion entre lo publico y lo privado. El
curso se propone `sociologizar' la comprension de las politicas educativas (en su origen,
institucionalizacion, actores, intereses, produccion, (co)implementacion, impacto), para comprender su
relacion con los cambios sociales y culturales actuales.

II.   OBJETIVOS

    1. Discutir diferentes paradigmas de politica educativa que organizan e inspiran las iniciativas
        educacionales.
    2. Discutir evidencia empirica sobre un rango de topicos educacionales y las bases conceptuales que
        la informan.
    3. Aplicar los enfoques y evidencia comparada para analizar sociologicamente los debates actuales
        de la reforma educacional chilena.

III. CONTENIDOS

    1. La reconfiguracion del Estado en su modo de organizar los sistemas escolares
    2. Globalizacion y la circulacion mundial de politicas educativas
    3. Declive de la separacion publico/privado en educacion
    4. Modelos contemporaneos y vias de reforma educacional
    5. Enfoques de accountability educacional: estandarizacion, medicion, privatizacion.
    6. Modelos de asignacion de cupos y cohesion sociocultural: eleccion, seleccion, expulsion
    7. Institucion escolar, contextos socioeconomicos y resultados educacionales
    8. Sociologia de las profesiones: el caso de los profesores

IV. METODOLOGIA

     Clases expositivas
     Analisis de casos
     Lectura individual

V.    EVALUACION

     Analisis de una politica educativa especifica       60%
     Revision de literatura aplicada                     40%




                                                                                                          1

VI. BIBLIOGRAFIA

Minima

    Alexander, R. (2011) `Evidence, rhetoric and collateral damage: the problematic pursuit
     of `world class' standards', Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 41, Issue 3.
    Anne West, Dabney Ingram and Audrey Hind (2006) ''Skimming the Cream'': Admissions
     to Charter Schools in the United States and to Autonomous Schools in England.
     Educational Policy, 6, 20: 615. DOI: 10.1177/0895904805284054
    Ball, S.J (2012) Global Education INC. New policy networks and the neoliberal
     imaginary. Routledge
    Hargreaves, A. & Fullan, M. (2012) Professional Capital. Transforming Teaching in
     every School. Routledge. Cap. 4, 5, 6 y 7.
    Harry Brighouse (2005) On Education. Routledge. Caps. 2, 3, 4.
    Lemke, T. (2011) Foucault, Governmentality and Critique.
    Luyten, H., Visscher, A. and Witziers, B. (2005) "School effectiveness research: from a
     review of the criticism to recommendations for further development". School
     Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(3): 249-279.
    Power, S. & Taylor, C. 2013. Social justice and education in the public and private
     spheres, Oxford Review of Education, 39:4, 464-479, DOI:
     10.1080/03054985.2013.821854
    Ravitch, D. (2010) The death and life of the great American School System. How Testing
     and Choice Are Undermining Education. Cap. 2, 7 y 8
    Sahlberg, P. 2011. Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change
     in Finland? New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Shirley, D. & Hargreaves, A. (2009) The Fourth Way, ch 1, 3 y 4.
    Stephen J. Ball (2004) Performativities and fabrications in the education economy:
     towards the performative society. In: Stephen J. Ball (2004) Sociology of Education.
     London: Routledgefalmer.
    Suspitsyna, T. (2010) "Accountability in American education as a rhetoric and a
     technology of governmentality", Journal of Education Policy, 25:5
    Thrupp, M (1995) `The school mix effect: the history of an enduring problem in
     educational research, policy and practice', British Journal of Sociology of Education, 16:
     183-203
    Woods, P., Woods, G & Hunter, G. (2007) Academy schools and entrepreneurialism in
     education, Journal of Education Policy. DOI: 10.1080/02680930601158984


Complementaria

    Alexander, R. (ed) (2010) Children, their Worlds, their Education. Final report and
     recommendations of The Cambridge Primary Review, Routledge, London.
    Angus, L. (1993) "The Sociology of School Effectiveness" Review Essay British Journal
     of Sociology of Education 14(3): 333-345.
    Carrasco, A., Flores, C., Bogolasky, F., Gutierrez, G., & San Martin, E. (2014). Seleccion
     de estudiantes y desigualdad educacional en Chile: ?que tan coactiva es la regulacion que
     la prohibe?. FONIDE Report N? 711286. www.fonide.cl.


                                                                                               2

 Coffield, F. (2012) `Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems', Journal
 of Education Policy, 27(1), 131-149.
 Contreras, D., Bustos, S. and Sepulveda, P. (2007) When schools are the ones that
 choose: the effect of screening in Chile. Serie Documentos de Trabajo 242. Dpto.
 Economia-Universidad de Chile.
 D. Ravitch (2013) The reing of error. capitulos 5 (The facts about test scores), 7 (The
 facts about the international test scores), 11 (the facts about teachers and test scores) y 28
 (Measures knowledge and skills with care).
 Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education. How America's
 commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press,
 Columbia University.
 Flores, C., y Carrasco, A. (2013), (Des)Igualdad de oportunidades para elegir escuela:
 preferencias, libertad de eleccion y segregacion escolar. Documento de Referencia N?2,
 Espacio Publico. www.espaciopublico.cl
 Foley, B. and Goldstein, H. (2012), Measuring Success. League Tables in the Public
 Sector. British Academy, Policy Centre, London.
 Fuhrman, S. and Elmore, R. (2004). Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education.
 New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
 Garn, G., Cobb, C. (2012). School Choice and Accountability. En Miron, G., Welner, K.,
 Hinchey, P., Mathis, W. (Eds.). Exploring the School Choice Universe: Evidence and
 Recommendations (pp. 89-104). USA: National Education Policy Center, University of
 Colorado Boulder.
 Goldstein, H. & Spiegelhalter (1996) "League tables and their limitations", Royal
 Statistical Society, Series A, Part 3, 385-443.
 Goldstein, H. and Woodhouse, G. (2000) `School Effectiveness Research and Education
 Policy', Oxford Review of Education, 26, pp. 353-63.
 Hargreaves & Braun (2013) `Data-driven improvement and accountability'. Boston
 College.
 Hatcher, R. (2005) "The distribution of leadership and power in schools". British Journal
 of Sociology of Education, 26(2): 253-267.
 Hursh, D. (2013). Raising the stakes: High-stakes testing and the attack on public
 education in New York, Journal of Education Policy, 28 (5), 574-588,
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.758829
 Jarvis, P. (2004) Globalisation, the learning society and comparative education. In:
 Stephen J. Ball (2004) Sociology of Education. London: Routledgefalmer.
 Levin, H. (2012) `More than just test scores' Quarterly Review of Comparative
 Education
 Linda Darling-Hammond (2013) `Educar con Calidad y Equidad. Dilemas del siglo XXI.
 Cap. 5 y 6
 Lubienski, C. & Lubiensk, S. (2014). The Public School Advantage. Why public schools
 outperform private schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
 Miron, G., Welner, K., Hinchey, P. & Mathis, W. (eds.) (2012) Exploring The School
 Choice Universe: evidence and recomendations. The National Education Policy Center
 series. Information Age Publishing, Inc. (cahp 2)
 OECD (2008) Measuring improvements in learning outcomes. Best practices to assess the
 value-added of schools. Caps 1, 2 y 3.



                                                                                               3

 Power, M. 1999. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University
 Press.
 Rizvi, F. & B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing education policy.London & New York:
 Routledge.
 Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J. & Kauko, J. 2013. The paradox of the education race:
 how to win the ranking game by sailing to headwind Journal of Education policy, 28 (5),
 612-633.
 Stephen J. Ball (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity, Journal of
 Education Policy, 18:2, 215-228
 Thrupp, M. and Lupton (2011) Variations on a middle class theme: English primary
 schools in socially advantaged contexts, Journal of Education Policy
 Thrupp, M., Lauder, H., and Robinson, T. (2002) "School Composition and Peer Effects"
 International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5) 483-504.
 Wrigley, T. (2004) "School Effectiveness: the problem of the reductionism". British
 Educational Research Journal 30(2): 227-44.




                                                                                          4